Complete Literature Review Workflow Using SciSpace
TL;DR
1-min readA literature review asks for much more than a list of papers: you also have to read closely, compare studies and shape everything into coherent writing. This hands-on tutorial walks through a complete review workflow in SciSpace organised into four stages: discover, analyze, understand and synthesize. It is aimed at PhD scholars, master's students, faculty and research professionals at any point in a review, from early scoping to the final write-up, and attendees were able to try each step live on their own topics.
Key takeaways
- Semantic, AI-powered search helps you surface studies that address your question even when they use different wording, so relevant work is less likely to slip past a strict keyword query.
- Pairing semantic search with conventional database searching is a sensible way to explore a topic broadly while still checking that coverage is complete.
- Side-by-side comparison tables let you line up the methods, results and limitations of many papers at once, which makes patterns and disagreements across the literature easier to see.
- Chat with PDF can explain dense passages, equations and unfamiliar terminology, helping you understand a difficult paper before deciding how it fits your argument.
- The synthesize stage turns your reading into structured notes, summaries and drafts that keep their citations attached, giving you material you can build directly into a thesis, dissertation or journal article.
- Mapping the familiar review steps of searching, screening, extracting and comparing onto these four stages gives you a repeatable routine rather than an ad hoc process.
To apply this, start your next review in SciSpace with a semantic search, move promising papers into a comparison table, and draft your synthesis from the resulting notes.
How to do it
Discover papers with semantic search
Start your literature review workflow by running a semantic AI search in SciSpace. It surfaces relevant papers beyond exact keyword matches, so you miss less important work.
Compare papers in structured tables
Add multiple papers to a table and pull out their methods, results and limitations. Side-by-side comparison makes patterns across studies easy to see.
Chat with PDFs to understand them
Open difficult papers with Chat with PDF and ask about complex sections, equations or technical jargon. This helps you read closely without getting stuck.
Synthesise notes into drafts
Turn your reading into structured notes and summaries, then shape them into citation-ready drafts. This connects analysis directly to writing.
Watch the tutorial37 min
Chapters
- Welcome: why use SciSpace instead of ChatGPT for literature searches
- How an AI literature review replaces one-paper-at-a-time PubMed searching
- Zotero vs Mendeley: which free reference manager to use
- How to set up Zotero: connector, collections and adding papers by DOI
- SciSpace browser extension: chat with any journal page and save to Zotero
- Standard vs High Quality vs Deep Review in SciSpace literature review
- What a SciSpace Deep Review report includes: methods table, gaps and PDF export
- High Quality mode and filtering for full-text and open-access papers
- Chat with PDF in SciSpace: explain text, podcast and save to Zotero
- How to sync your Zotero library with SciSpace
- Can you chat with multiple PDFs at once? Chat with files in SciSpace
- How to build a PubMed Boolean search string with an AI agent
- How to import multiple PubMed papers into Zotero at once
- Using SciSpace and Zotero inside Google Scholar
- Reproducible literature search in SciSpace across PubMed and Zotero
- How to find research gaps with AI using a custom prompt
- How to cite while you write: Zotero citations in Word and Google Docs
- How to use SciSpace inside ChatGPT to find research papers
- Recap: a literature review workflow that feeds back into SciSpace
Try this on SciSpace
Literature Review Generator
Open agent →Literature Review Matrix
Open agent →Paper Summarizer
Open agent →
Frequently asked questions
What are the main steps of a literature review?
Most reviews follow a similar path: define the question, search for relevant studies, screen and select them, read and extract key information, compare findings, and synthesise them into themes or arguments. This tutorial maps those steps onto four practical stages in SciSpace: discover, analyze, understand and synthesize, ending with notes and drafts that are ready for citation.
How does semantic search differ from keyword search for papers?
Keyword search matches the exact terms you type, so papers using different wording can be missed. Semantic search interprets the meaning of your question and returns studies that address the same concept even if they use other terminology. It is useful early in a review, though combining it with database searches helps ensure coverage.
Related tutorials
EN36 minTutorialAgentic AI for Researchers: From Literature Search to Submission
A researcher-led walkthrough of using agentic AI in SciSpace to move from literature search to a submission-ready manuscript.
EN38 minTutorialAgentic Research Workflow in SciSpace: From Search to Submission
Follow one research project through an end-to-end agentic workflow in SciSpace, from first search to journal submission, with human checkpoints throughout.
TR30 minEğitimSciSpace ile Yapay Zekâ Destekli Literatür Taraması: Sorudan Rapora
İlk arama sorgusundan atıflı rapora kadar, ajanlı ve ajansız yaklaşımları birleştiren bir SciSpace literatür tarama iş akışını öğrenin.
