SciSpace AcademyLevel: Intermediate · 6 lessons
A structured route through a full systematic review: from planning and PRISMA-ready screening to evidence synthesis, a real case study and running reviews as a team.
EN35 minA systematic review in SciSpace can use AI assistance, but it must remain protocol-driven and reproducible. Define eligibility, outcomes, sources, dates, and synthesis methods before searching; document every query and screening decision; extract the same fields from each included study; assess quality; and preserve the evidence trail needed to reconstruct the review.
ENIn SciSpace, a PRISMA-ready review is one whose search, screening, exclusions, extraction, appraisal, and synthesis can be reconstructed. Save every database strategy, retain record counts and exclusion reasons, apply a protocol consistently, and verify that the final report aligns with the PRISMA checklist and flow diagram.
ENUse SciSpace to support a rapid review by narrowing scope and streamlining methods—not by hiding shortcuts. Agree on the question, timeframe, stakeholders, and minimum evidence standard; document restricted searches and screening decisions; extract consistently; and state what the accelerated method may have missed.
ENUse this SciSpace case study to see how a systematic review changes when real records expose ambiguous criteria, missing synonyms, and borderline decisions. Recreate the protocol, pilot screening, extraction, quality appraisal, and synthesis, then compare each decision with the video rationale rather than copying the final output.
ENSciSpace can automate much of the operational work of a systematic review while preserving researcher approval at critical stages. The workflow records the research questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, database-specific search queries, screening decisions, extracted evidence, PRISMA flow diagram, and final structured report so the review remains traceable.
ENWhen SciSpace generates a research answer, verify it by separating extracted evidence, synthesis, inference, recommendation, and unknowns. Open the supporting sources, confirm that each exists and supports the claim, check methods and numbers, compare contradictory evidence, and label uncertainty before using the answer in research or decisions.
PT43 minO Prof. Ricardo Limongi mostra como conduzir um projeto completo no SciSpace, da busca à submissão, seguindo as boas práticas do PRISMA.
PT1 h 5 minVeja como usar o SciSpace em cada fase da revisão sistemática para ganhar agilidade sem abrir mão do rigor metodológico.
EN49 minLearn a structured way to plan and run a rapid or systematic review with SciSpace so evidence synthesis is faster but still methodical.