SciSpace Academy
Tutorial

How Research Teams Can Use SciSpace Biomedical Agent

SciSpace AcademyEnglishStart here

TL;DR

1-min read

In SciSpace Biomedical Agent, a research team should share the same question, evidence boundaries, extraction fields, and review responsibilities before running an agentic workflow. Pilot the task, inspect the search and evidence table together, assign domain review, and retain decisions so that another team member can reproduce the result.

How to do it

  1. Define the team’s biomedical question and approved evidence sources.

    Write one shared biomedical question and approve the databases, evidence types, date range, and safety or outcome fields. Clarify which scientific decisions belong to named experts.

  2. Create a shared prompt and extraction template.

    Create a common prompt and extraction form with definitions for every field. Include source passage, page, uncertainty, and reviewer status so records can be audited.

  3. Run the workflow on a small pilot set and compare AI extraction with expert review.

    Run the workflow on a small, diverse paper set and compare the AI extraction with independent expert review. Measure agreement and document recurring errors or ambiguous fields.

  4. Refine the template before applying it to a larger project.

    Revise the prompt and schema before scaling, then assign review responsibilities for pivotal studies and final synthesis. Keep one versioned evidence table for the whole team.

Watch the tutorial3 min

Try this on SciSpace

Frequently asked questions

What does this tutorial cover?

In SciSpace Biomedical Agent, a research team should share the same question, evidence boundaries, extraction fields, and review responsibilities before running an agentic workflow. Pilot the task, inspect the search and evidence table together, assign domain review, and retain decisions so that another team member can reproduce the result.

What should I do first?

Write one shared biomedical question and approve the databases, evidence types, date range, and safety or outcome fields. Clarify which scientific decisions belong to named experts.

What is the final step?

Revise the prompt and schema before scaling, then assign review responsibilities for pivotal studies and final synthesis. Keep one versioned evidence table for the whole team.